Army may swap list of artificial intelligence materials for simpler 'baseball cards'


The U.S. Army is revising its artificial intelligence materials list after a meeting with defense contractors.

The service last year floated the idea of ​​an AI BOM, which would be similar to an existing software bill, or a comprehensive list of the components and dependencies that make up programs and digital products. This transparency approach is promoted by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and other organizations.

Young Bang, principal deputy assistant secretary for acquisition, logistics and technology, said the Army is now moving toward an “artificial intelligence summary card.” He compared it to a baseball card, where useful information is clear at a glance.

“It has certain statistics about the algorithm, its intended use and that kind of information,” Bang told reporters at an April 22 Pentagon press briefing. “It's not as detailed in terms of intellectual property rights, and it's not necessarily poses a threat to the industry.

The Department of Defense is spending billions of dollars on artificial intelligence, autonomy and machine learning as leaders demand faster decision-making, longer and longer range intelligence collection, and reduced risk to personnel on an increasingly high-tech battlefield.

According to the Government Accountability Office, there are more than 685 AI-related projects underway across the department, with the Army responsible for at least 230 of them. The technology is expected to play a key role in the XM30 mechanized infantry fighting vehicle (formerly known as the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle) and the Tactical Intelligence Target Access Node (TITAN).

The goal of the AI ​​BOM, or summary card, is not to reverse-engineer private-sector products or put companies out of business, Bang said.

Instead, it allows people to better understand the ins and outs of algorithms, ultimately fostering trust in people who can make life and death decisions.

“We know innovation is happening in the open source environment. We also know who is contributing to open source,” Bharat Patel, program director for the Army's Program Executive Office for Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors, told reporters . “So it goes back to how the original model was trained, who was exposed to that model, would it be poisonous or something?

More meetings with industry are planned, according to the Army.

Colin Demarest is a reporter for C4ISRNET, covering military cyber, networking and IT. Colin previously covered the Department of Energy and its National Nuclear Security Administration, Cold War Cleanup and Nuclear Weapons Development, for a South Carolina daily. Colin is also an award-winning photographer.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *